QuarterfinalMenOctober 24, 2026
Moragues / Fonteny v Naranjo / Zapata
Pre-match odds
57%
Avg Elo 1591
43%
Avg Elo 1566
Elo gap 25
Moragues / Fonteny delivered as 57% favourites.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Moragues / FontenyNaranjo / Zapata
- Points won 42%
- Points won on serve 47%
- Points won on return 36%
- 1st-serve points won 50%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 35%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 40%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 9
- Double faults 1
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 42%
- Points won on serve 54%
- Points won on return 27%
- 1st-serve points won 58%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 27%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 0%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 3
- Service games 4
Set 2
- Points won 42%
- Points won on serve 42%
- Points won on return 42%
- 1st-serve points won 43%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 41%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 40%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 5
- Double faults 1
Point by point
Scores read Moragues / Fonteny first, Naranjo / Zapata second.
87 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 16–2
Breaks 2–0
- 0–1Hold
Naranjo / Zapata serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 1–1Hold
Moragues / Fonteny serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 2–1Break
Naranjo / Zapata serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
- 3–1Hold
Moragues / Fonteny serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–30
- 4–1Break
Naranjo / Zapata serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 5–1Hold
Moragues / Fonteny serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 5–2Hold
Naranjo / Zapata serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 6–2Hold
Moragues / Fonteny serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
Set 26–4
Breaks 3–2
- 0–1Hold
Naranjo / Zapata serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 1–1Hold
Moragues / Fonteny serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 1–2Hold
Naranjo / Zapata serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 2–2Hold
Moragues / Fonteny serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 3–2Break
Naranjo / Zapata serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 3–3Break
Moragues / Fonteny serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 4–3Break
Naranjo / Zapata serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0BP
- 4–4Break
Moragues / Fonteny serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 5–4Break
Naranjo / Zapata serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 6–4Hold
Moragues / Fonteny serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.

