Round of 32MenOctober 26, 2026
Navarro / Di Nenno v Montiel / Santigosa
Pre-match odds
80%
Avg Elo 1815
20%
Avg Elo 1696
Elo gap 119
Navarro / Di Nenno delivered as 80% favourites.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Navarro / Di NennoMontiel / Santigosa
- Points won 39%
- Points won on serve 42%
- Points won on return 38%
- 1st-serve points won 39%
- 2nd-serve points won 57%
- Points won returning 1st serve 37%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 40%
- Break points converted 29%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 8
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 35%
- Points won on serve 30%
- Points won on return 38%
- 1st-serve points won 27%
- 2nd-serve points won 40%
- Points won returning 1st serve 24%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 75%
- Break points converted 50%
- Longest run of points 3
- Service games 4
Set 2
- Points won 44%
- Points won on serve 52%
- Points won on return 38%
- 1st-serve points won 48%
- 2nd-serve points won 100%
- Points won returning 1st serve 48%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 0%
- Break points converted 20%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 4
Point by point
Scores read Navarro / Di Nenno first, Montiel / Santigosa second.
88 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 16–2
Breaks 3–1
- 1–0Hold
Navarro / Di Nenno serving
- 15–15
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 1–1Hold
Montiel / Santigosa serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 1–2Break
Navarro / Di Nenno serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 2–2Break
Montiel / Santigosa serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0BP
- 3–2Hold
Navarro / Di Nenno serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 4–2Break
Montiel / Santigosa serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0BP
- 5–2Hold
Navarro / Di Nenno serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 6–2Break
Montiel / Santigosa serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
Set 26–3
Breaks 2–1
- 0–1Break
Navarro / Di Nenno serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 0–2Hold
Montiel / Santigosa serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 1–2Hold
Navarro / Di Nenno serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 2–2Break
Montiel / Santigosa serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 3–2Hold
Navarro / Di Nenno serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 3–3Hold
Montiel / Santigosa serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 4–3Hold
Navarro / Di Nenno serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 5–3Break
Montiel / Santigosa serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–30BP
- 6–3Hold
Navarro / Di Nenno serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.


