Round of 32MenOctober 26, 2026
Castaño / Hernandez v Arroyo / Jimenez
Pre-match odds
45%
Avg Elo 1666
55%
Avg Elo 1685
Elo gap 19
Castaño / Hernandez won as slight underdogs (45%).
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Castaño / HernandezArroyo / Jimenez
- Points won 42%
- Points won on serve 55%
- Points won on return 25%
- 1st-serve points won 55%
- 2nd-serve points won 57%
- Points won returning 1st serve 24%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 33%
- Break points converted 100%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 9
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 44%
- Points won on serve 55%
- Points won on return 31%
- 1st-serve points won 52%
- 2nd-serve points won 75%
- Points won returning 1st serve 28%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 100%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 4
Set 2
- Points won 41%
- Points won on serve 56%
- Points won on return 16%
- 1st-serve points won 59%
- 2nd-serve points won 33%
- Points won returning 1st serve 18%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 0%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 5
Point by point
Scores read Castaño / Hernandez first, Arroyo / Jimenez second.
88 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 16–3
Breaks 2–1
- 0–1Break
Castaño / Hernandez serving
- 30–15
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 1–1Break
Arroyo / Jimenez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- 2–1Hold
Castaño / Hernandez serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 2–2Hold
Arroyo / Jimenez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 3–2Hold
Castaño / Hernandez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 3–3Hold
Arroyo / Jimenez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 4–3Hold
Castaño / Hernandez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 5–3Break
Arroyo / Jimenez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 6–3Hold
Castaño / Hernandez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 40–15
Set 26–3
Breaks 2–0
- 0–1Hold
Arroyo / Jimenez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–40
- 1–1Hold
Castaño / Hernandez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 1–2Hold
Arroyo / Jimenez serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 2–2Hold
Castaño / Hernandez serving
- 15–0
- 2–3Hold
Arroyo / Jimenez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 3–3Hold
Castaño / Hernandez serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 4–3Break
Arroyo / Jimenez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 5–3Hold
Castaño / Hernandez serving
- 15–0
- 0–0
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 6–3Break
Arroyo / Jimenez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- A–40BP
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.



