Round of 32MenOctober 27, 2026
Tello / Arce v Axelsson / Ortega
Pre-match odds
83%
Avg Elo 1767
17%
Avg Elo 1631
Elo gap 136
Tello / Arce delivered as 83% favourites.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Tello / ArceAxelsson / Ortega
- Points won 49%
- Points won on serve 57%
- Points won on return 40%
- 1st-serve points won 55%
- 2nd-serve points won 75%
- Points won returning 1st serve 39%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 43%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 15
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 45%
- Points won on serve 52%
- Points won on return 38%
- 1st-serve points won 48%
- 2nd-serve points won 75%
- Points won returning 1st serve 40%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 25%
- Break points converted 50%
- Longest run of points 3
- Service games 5
Set 2
- Points won 55%
- Points won on serve 62%
- Points won on return 47%
- 1st-serve points won 62%
- 2nd-serve points won 67%
- Points won returning 1st serve 43%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 100%
- Break points converted 50%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 5
Set 3
- Points won 46%
- Points won on serve 56%
- Points won on return 34%
- 1st-serve points won 55%
- 2nd-serve points won 100%
- Points won returning 1st serve 32%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 3
- Service games 5
Point by point
Scores read Tello / Arce first, Axelsson / Ortega second.
142 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published. The feed had gaps during this match, so some games are missing.
Set 16–4
Breaks 1–1
- 2–0Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 2–1Hold
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 2–2Break
Tello / Arce serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 3–2Break
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 4–2Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 4–3Hold
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 5–3Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15
- 5–4Hold
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 6–4Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
Set 24–6
Breaks 1–2
- 1–0Break
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–30BP
- 2–0Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 2–1Hold
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–40
- 3–1Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 15–0
- 0–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 3–2Hold
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- 3–3Break
Tello / Arce serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 3–4Hold
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 0–15
- 4–4Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 4–5Hold
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 4–6Break
Tello / Arce serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
Set 36–3
Breaks 2–0
- 0–1Hold
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 1–1Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 40–15
- 1–2Hold
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 2–2Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- A–40
- 3–2Break
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 4–2Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 4–3Hold
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 5–3Hold
Tello / Arce serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 6–3Break
Axelsson / Ortega serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.


