The Padel Brief

Round of 64WomenOctober 26, 2026

Gibson / Fernandez v Ortiz / Ferreyra

A. GibsonC. Fernandez
630
0
A. OrtizM. FerreyraOrtiz / Ferreyra serving
266
0
LiveCourt 3 Volvo

Pre-match odds

Gibson / Fernandez

38%

Avg Elo 1513

Ortiz / Ferreyra

62%

Avg Elo 1555

Elo gap 42

Ortiz / Ferreyra are slight favourites — they'd win about 6 in 10.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Point by point

Scores read Gibson / Fernandez first, Ortiz / Ferreyra second.

141 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published. Point capture for this match was incomplete.

Set 30–6

Breaks 0–3

  1. 0–6

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    In play
  2. 0–6

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 0–0
    3. 15–0
    4. 15–15
    5. 15–30
    6. 15–40
    Hold
  3. 0–5

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 30–30
    4. 30–40BP
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40
    7. 40–40
    8. A–40
    9. 40–40
    Break
  4. 0–4

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 30–30
    4. 30–40
    Hold
  5. 0–3

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    4. 40–15
    5. 40–30
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–ABP
    Break
  6. 0–2

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–40
    Hold
  7. 0–1

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    4. 15–40BP
    5. 30–40BP
    Break

Set 23–6

Breaks 0–1

  1. 3–6

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    Hold
  2. 3–5

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15
    5. 40–30
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–ABP
    Break
  3. 3–4

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–A
    Hold
  4. 3–3

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    Hold
  5. 2–3

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40
    Hold
  6. 2–2

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15
    Hold
  7. 1–2

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30BP
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–A
    Hold
  8. 1–1

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40BP
    6. 40–40
    7. A–40
    8. 40–40
    9. A–40
    10. 40–40
    Hold
  9. 0–1

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    6. 40–40
    7. A–40BP
    8. 40–40
    9. A–40BP
    10. 40–40
    Hold

Set 16–2

Breaks 3–1

  1. 6–2

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–30
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40
    Hold
  2. 5–2

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40
    5. 30–40
    6. 40–40
    7. A–40BP
    8. 40–40
    9. A–40BP
    10. 40–40
    11. A–40BP
    12. 40–40
    Break
  3. 4–2

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40BP
    5. 30–40BP
    Break
  4. 4–1

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40
    Hold
  5. 4–0

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    Hold
  6. 3–0

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30BP
    Break
  7. 2–0

    Gibson / Fernandez serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    Hold
  8. 1–0

    Ortiz / Ferreyra serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 40–30BP
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40BP
    Break

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.