The Padel Brief

Group stageWomenNovember 2, 2026

Mansart / Godallier v Sermant / Vierendeels

C. MansartL. Godallier
Winner
66
N. SermantR. Vierendeels
12
Center Court00:45

Pre-match odds

Mansart / Godallier

79%

Avg Elo 1577

Sermant / Vierendeels

21%

Avg Elo 1462

Elo gap 115

Mansart / Godallier delivered as 79% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Mansart / GodallierSermant / Vierendeels

66%
Points won
34%
80%
Points won on serve
48%
52%
Points won on return
20%
78%
1st-serve points won
50%
100%
2nd-serve points won
0%
50%
Points won returning 1st serve
22%
100%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
100%
Break points converted
0%
6
Longest run of points
4
8
Service games
7
Stats by set

Set 1

67%
Points won
33%
77%
Points won on serve
45%
55%
Points won on return
23%
74%
1st-serve points won
45%
100%
2nd-serve points won
0%
55%
Points won returning 1st serve
26%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
100%
Break points converted
0%
6
Longest run of points
2
4
Service games
3

Set 2

66%
Points won
34%
84%
Points won on serve
50%
50%
Points won on return
16%
82%
1st-serve points won
55%
100%
2nd-serve points won
0%
45%
Points won returning 1st serve
18%
100%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
100%
Break points converted
0%
6
Longest run of points
4
4
Service games
4

Point by point

Scores read Mansart / Godallier first, Sermant / Vierendeels second.

60 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 16–1

Breaks 2–0

  1. 1–0

    Mansart / Godallier serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 40–40
    5. A–40
    Hold
  2. 1–1

    Sermant / Vierendeels serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–A
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    Mansart / Godallier serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  4. 3–1

    Sermant / Vierendeels serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30BP
    Break
  5. 4–1

    Mansart / Godallier serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–15
    Hold
  6. 5–1

    Sermant / Vierendeels serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 40–30BP
    Break
  7. 6–1

    Mansart / Godallier serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    Hold

Set 26–2

Breaks 2–0

  1. 0–1

    Sermant / Vierendeels serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 30–40
    Hold
  2. 1–1

    Mansart / Godallier serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    Sermant / Vierendeels serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    Break
  4. 3–1

    Mansart / Godallier serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15
    Hold
  5. 3–2

    Sermant / Vierendeels serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  6. 4–2

    Mansart / Godallier serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15
    Hold
  7. 5–2

    Sermant / Vierendeels serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    Break
  8. 6–2

    Mansart / Godallier serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 15–0
    4. 30–0
    Hold

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.