The Padel Brief

Group stageWomenNovember 2, 2026

Björk / Kjaergaard v Rompies / Putria

L. BjörkS. Kjaergaard
Winner
66
J. RompiesN. Putria
43
Court 801:12

Pre-match odds

Björk / Kjaergaard

47%

Avg Elo 1483

Rompies / Putria

53%

Avg Elo 1495

Elo gap 12

Björk / Kjaergaard won a near coin flip (47%).

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Björk / KjaergaardRompies / Putria

56%
Points won
44%
64%
Points won on serve
51%
49%
Points won on return
36%
64%
1st-serve points won
51%
0%
2nd-serve points won
0%
49%
Points won returning 1st serve
36%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
38%
Break points converted
29%
11
Longest run of points
12
9
Service games
10
Stats by set

Set 1

55%
Points won
45%
67%
Points won on serve
54%
46%
Points won on return
33%
67%
1st-serve points won
54%
0%
2nd-serve points won
0%
46%
Points won returning 1st serve
33%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
25%
Break points converted
25%
11
Longest run of points
12
5
Service games
5

Set 2

57%
Points won
43%
62%
Points won on serve
47%
53%
Points won on return
38%
62%
1st-serve points won
47%
0%
2nd-serve points won
0%
53%
Points won returning 1st serve
38%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
60%
Break points converted
33%
6
Longest run of points
3
4
Service games
5

Point by point

Scores read Björk / Kjaergaard first, Rompies / Putria second.

99 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 16–4

Breaks 2–1

  1. 0–1

    Rompies / Putria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–15BP
    4. 40–30BP
    5. 40–40
    6. 40–A
    7. 40–40
    Hold
  2. 0–2

    Björk / Kjaergaard serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    Break
  3. 1–2

    Rompies / Putria serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    4. 30–40
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40BP
    Break
  4. 2–2

    Björk / Kjaergaard serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  5. 2–3

    Rompies / Putria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–A
    Hold
  6. 3–3

    Björk / Kjaergaard serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15
    Hold
  7. 4–3

    Rompies / Putria serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    Break
  8. 5–3

    Björk / Kjaergaard serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 0–0
    3. 15–0
    4. 30–0
    Hold
  9. 5–4

    Rompies / Putria serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40
    Hold
  10. 6–4

    Björk / Kjaergaard serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 15–40BP
    4. 30–40BP
    5. 40–40
    6. 40–ABP
    7. 40–40
    8. A–40
    Hold

Set 26–3

Breaks 3–1

  1. 0–1

    Rompies / Putria serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 30–30
    4. 40–30BP
    5. 40–40
    6. 40–A
    Hold
  2. 1–1

    Björk / Kjaergaard serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 15–0
    4. 30–15
    Hold
  3. 1–2

    Rompies / Putria serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  4. 2–2

    Björk / Kjaergaard serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    Hold
  5. 3–2

    Rompies / Putria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    Break
  6. 4–2

    Björk / Kjaergaard serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    4. 40–15
    Hold
  7. 5–2

    Rompies / Putria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–30BP
    5. 30–30
    Break
  8. 5–3

    Björk / Kjaergaard serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 30–40BP
    5. 40–40
    6. 40–ABP
    7. 40–40
    8. 40–ABP
    Break
  9. 6–3

    Rompies / Putria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–40
    6. 40–A
    7. 40–40
    8. 40–A
    9. 40–40
    10. A–40BP
    Break

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.