The Padel Brief

Group stageMenNovember 2, 2026

Al Janahi / Walid v Gonzalez / Miltos

A. Al JanahiR. Walid
01
M. GonzalezS. Miltos
Winner
66
Court 600:38

Pre-match odds

Al Janahi / Walid

11%

Avg Elo 1446

Gonzalez / Miltos

89%

Avg Elo 1631

Elo gap 186

Gonzalez / Miltos delivered as 89% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Al Janahi / WalidGonzalez / Miltos

29%
Points won
71%
40%
Points won on serve
85%
15%
Points won on return
60%
42%
1st-serve points won
85%
33%
2nd-serve points won
83%
15%
Points won returning 1st serve
58%
17%
Points won returning 2nd serve
67%
0%
Break points converted
71%
5
Longest run of points
8
6
Service games
7
Stats by set

Set 1

25%
Points won
75%
29%
Points won on serve
80%
20%
Points won on return
71%
25%
1st-serve points won
77%
100%
2nd-serve points won
100%
23%
Points won returning 1st serve
75%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
0%
Break points converted
75%
2
Longest run of points
5
3
Service games
3

Set 2

33%
Points won
67%
48%
Points won on serve
89%
11%
Points won on return
52%
55%
1st-serve points won
93%
20%
2nd-serve points won
75%
7%
Points won returning 1st serve
45%
25%
Points won returning 2nd serve
80%
0%
Break points converted
67%
5
Longest run of points
8
3
Service games
4

Point by point

Scores read Al Janahi / Walid first, Gonzalez / Miltos second.

52 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 10–6

Breaks 0–3

  1. 0–1

    Gonzalez / Miltos serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–30
    Hold
  2. 0–2

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40BP
    Break
  3. 0–3

    Gonzalez / Miltos serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  4. 0–4

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40BP
    Break
  5. 0–5

    Gonzalez / Miltos serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  6. 0–6

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–40BP
    Break

Set 21–6

Breaks 0–2

  1. 0–1

    Gonzalez / Miltos serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    Hold
  2. 0–2

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–30
    5. 40–40
    6. 40–ABP
    7. 40–40
    8. 40–ABP
    Break
  3. 0–3

    Gonzalez / Miltos serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  4. 0–4

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    6. 40–40
    7. A–40
    8. 40–40
    9. 40–ABP
    Break
  5. 0–5

    Gonzalez / Miltos serving

      Hold
    1. 1–5

      Al Janahi / Walid serving

      1. 0–15
      2. 15–15
      3. 30–15
      4. 40–15
      Hold
    2. 1–6

      Gonzalez / Miltos serving

      1. 15–0
      2. 15–15
      3. 15–30
      4. 15–40
      Hold
    3. 1–6

      Gonzalez / Miltos serving

        —

      The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.