The Padel Brief

Group stageMenNovember 2, 2026

Al Janahi / Icardo v Dehnike / Abud

F. Al JanahiS. Icardo
22
F. DehnikeM. Abud
Winner
66
Court 600:48

Pre-match odds

Al Janahi / Icardo

36%

Avg Elo 1518

Dehnike / Abud

64%

Avg Elo 1567

Elo gap 49

Dehnike / Abud delivered as 64% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Al Janahi / IcardoDehnike / Abud

36%
Points won
64%
51%
Points won on serve
82%
18%
Points won on return
49%
54%
1st-serve points won
84%
38%
2nd-serve points won
50%
16%
Points won returning 1st serve
46%
50%
Points won returning 2nd serve
62%
0%
Break points converted
67%
4
Longest run of points
9
8
Service games
8
Stats by set

Set 1

37%
Points won
63%
52%
Points won on serve
84%
16%
Points won on return
48%
57%
1st-serve points won
83%
25%
2nd-serve points won
100%
17%
Points won returning 1st serve
43%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
75%
0%
Break points converted
50%
4
Longest run of points
6
4
Service games
4

Set 2

36%
Points won
64%
50%
Points won on serve
80%
20%
Points won on return
50%
50%
1st-serve points won
84%
50%
2nd-serve points won
0%
16%
Points won returning 1st serve
50%
100%
Points won returning 2nd serve
50%
0%
Break points converted
100%
4
Longest run of points
9
4
Service games
4

Point by point

Scores read Al Janahi / Icardo first, Dehnike / Abud second.

62 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 12–6

Breaks 0–2

  1. 1–0

    Al Janahi / Icardo serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    Hold
  2. 1–1

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    Hold
  3. 1–2

    Al Janahi / Icardo serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40BP
    Break
  4. 1–3

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  5. 1–4

    Al Janahi / Icardo serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40BP
    Break
  6. 1–5

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40
    Hold
  7. 2–5

    Al Janahi / Icardo serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15
    5. 40–30
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–ABP
    8. 40–40
    9. A–40
    Hold
  8. 2–6

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold

Set 22–6

Breaks 0–2

  1. 1–0

    Al Janahi / Icardo serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–15
    4. 40–30
    Hold
  2. 1–1

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–0
    3. 0–15
    4. 0–30
    5. 0–40
    Hold
  3. 1–2

    Al Janahi / Icardo serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40BP
    Break
  4. 1–3

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    Hold
  5. 2–3

    Al Janahi / Icardo serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    Hold
  6. 2–4

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 30–40
    Hold
  7. 2–5

    Al Janahi / Icardo serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40BP
    Break
  8. 2–6

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–40
    Hold

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.