The Padel Brief

Group stageWomenNovember 3, 2026

Abbud / Piltcher v Höfer / Renic

A. AbbudR. Piltcher
Winner
66
D. HöferL. Renic
10
Center Court00:53

Pre-match odds

Abbud / Piltcher

44%

Avg Elo 1419

Höfer / Renic

56%

Avg Elo 1441

Elo gap 22

Abbud / Piltcher won as slight underdogs (44%).

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Abbud / PiltcherHöfer / Renic

69%
Points won
31%
68%
Points won on serve
30%
70%
Points won on return
32%
63%
1st-serve points won
31%
86%
2nd-serve points won
22%
69%
Points won returning 1st serve
37%
78%
Points won returning 2nd serve
14%
88%
Break points converted
50%
7
Longest run of points
3
6
Service games
7
Stats by set

Set 1

68%
Points won
32%
58%
Points won on serve
23%
77%
Points won on return
42%
56%
1st-serve points won
20%
67%
2nd-serve points won
29%
80%
Points won returning 1st serve
44%
71%
Points won returning 2nd serve
33%
80%
Break points converted
50%
7
Longest run of points
3
3
Service games
4

Set 2

70%
Points won
30%
80%
Points won on serve
36%
64%
Points won on return
20%
73%
1st-serve points won
40%
100%
2nd-serve points won
0%
60%
Points won returning 1st serve
27%
100%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
100%
Break points converted
0%
5
Longest run of points
2
3
Service games
3

Point by point

Scores read Abbud / Piltcher first, Höfer / Renic second.

60 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 16–1

Breaks 4–1

  1. 1–0

    Höfer / Renic serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    Break
  2. 2–0

    Abbud / Piltcher serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    Hold
  3. 3–0

    Höfer / Renic serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 15–0
    4. 30–0
    5. 40–0BP
    Break
  4. 4–0

    Abbud / Piltcher serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15
    Hold
  5. 5–0

    Höfer / Renic serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0BP
    4. 30–0
    5. 40–0BP
    Break
  6. 5–1

    Abbud / Piltcher serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40BP
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–ABP
    Break
  7. 6–1

    Höfer / Renic serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–40
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40BP
    Break

Set 25–0

Breaks 2–0

  1. 1–0

    Abbud / Piltcher serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  2. 2–0

    Höfer / Renic serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    4. 30–40
    5. 40–40
    6. 40–A
    7. 40–40
    Break
  3. 3–0

    Abbud / Piltcher serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    Hold
  4. 4–0

    Höfer / Renic serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    Break
  5. 5–0

    Abbud / Piltcher serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15
    Hold
  6. 5–0

    Höfer / Renic serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–30BP
    —

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.