The Padel Brief

Group stageMenNovember 3, 2026

Chingotto / Augsburger v Nolten / Van Betuw

F. ChingottoL. Augsburger
Winner
66
J. NoltenN. Van Betuw
34
Grand Stand 201:03

Pre-match odds

Chingotto / Augsburger

99%

Avg Elo 1918

Nolten / Van Betuw

1%

Avg Elo 1487

Elo gap 431

Chingotto / Augsburger delivered as 99% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Chingotto / AugsburgerNolten / Van Betuw

57%
Points won
43%
73%
Points won on serve
59%
41%
Points won on return
27%
71%
1st-serve points won
55%
100%
2nd-serve points won
100%
45%
Points won returning 1st serve
29%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
29%
Break points converted
0%
10
Longest run of points
6
10
Service games
9
Stats by set

Set 1

61%
Points won
39%
73%
Points won on serve
57%
43%
Points won on return
27%
71%
1st-serve points won
53%
100%
2nd-serve points won
100%
47%
Points won returning 1st serve
29%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
100%
Break points converted
0%
10
Longest run of points
6
5
Service games
4

Set 2

55%
Points won
45%
72%
Points won on serve
59%
41%
Points won on return
28%
70%
1st-serve points won
56%
100%
2nd-serve points won
100%
44%
Points won returning 1st serve
30%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
17%
Break points converted
0%
6
Longest run of points
3
5
Service games
5

Point by point

Scores read Chingotto / Augsburger first, Nolten / Van Betuw second.

87 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 16–3

Breaks 1–0

  1. 1–0

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    4. 15–40BP
    5. 30–40BP
    6. 40–40
    7. A–40
    Hold
  2. 2–0

    Nolten / Van Betuw serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    Break
  3. 3–0

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    Hold
  4. 3–1

    Nolten / Van Betuw serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    Hold
  5. 4–1

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15
    Hold
  6. 4–2

    Nolten / Van Betuw serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    Hold
  7. 5–2

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    Hold
  8. 5–3

    Nolten / Van Betuw serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 0–0
    3. 15–15
    4. 15–30
    5. 15–40
    6. 15–15
    7. 15–30
    8. 15–40
    Hold
  9. 6–3

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40BP
    5. 30–40BP
    6. 40–40
    Hold

Set 26–4

Breaks 1–0

  1. 1–0

    Nolten / Van Betuw serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    6. 40–40
    Break
  2. 2–0

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–40
    5. A–40
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    Nolten / Van Betuw serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    Hold
  4. 3–1

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15
    Hold
  5. 3–2

    Nolten / Van Betuw serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  6. 4–2

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15
    4. 40–30
    Hold
  7. 4–3

    Nolten / Van Betuw serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  8. 5–3

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  9. 5–4

    Nolten / Van Betuw serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–30BP
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40BP
    7. 40–40
    8. 40–A
    9. 40–40
    Hold
  10. 6–4

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 0–15
    3. 15–15
    4. 30–15
    5. 40–15
    Hold
  11. 6–4

    Chingotto / Augsburger serving

      —

    The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.