Group stageMenNovember 3, 2026
Leal / Yanguas v Dehnike / Gonzalez
Pre-match odds
84%
Avg Elo 1743
16%
Avg Elo 1599
Elo gap 145
Leal / Yanguas delivered as 84% favourites.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Leal / YanguasDehnike / Gonzalez
- Points won 46%
- Points won on serve 58%
- Points won on return 33%
- 1st-serve points won 58%
- 2nd-serve points won 67%
- Points won returning 1st serve 31%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 43%
- Break points converted 25%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 9
- Aces 0
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 45%
- Points won on serve 62%
- Points won on return 20%
- 1st-serve points won 63%
- 2nd-serve points won 50%
- Points won returning 1st serve 14%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 5
- Aces 0
Set 2
- Points won 46%
- Points won on serve 52%
- Points won on return 42%
- 1st-serve points won 50%
- 2nd-serve points won 100%
- Points won returning 1st serve 42%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 33%
- Break points converted 25%
- Longest run of points 3
- Service games 4
Point by point
Scores read Leal / Yanguas first, Dehnike / Gonzalez second.
86 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 16–4
Breaks 1–0
- 1–0Hold
Leal / Yanguas serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 1–1Hold
Dehnike / Gonzalez serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–40
- 2–1Hold
Leal / Yanguas serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15
- 2–2Hold
Dehnike / Gonzalez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 3–2Hold
Leal / Yanguas serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 3–3Hold
Dehnike / Gonzalez serving
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 4–3Hold
Leal / Yanguas serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 4–4Hold
Dehnike / Gonzalez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 5–4Hold
Leal / Yanguas serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 6–4Break
Dehnike / Gonzalez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
Set 26–3
Breaks 2–1
- 1–0Hold
Leal / Yanguas serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 2–0Break
Dehnike / Gonzalez serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 3–0Hold
Leal / Yanguas serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 3–1Hold
Dehnike / Gonzalez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 3–2Break
Leal / Yanguas serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 3–3Hold
Dehnike / Gonzalez serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–40
- 4–3Hold
Leal / Yanguas serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 5–3Break
Dehnike / Gonzalez serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 6–3Hold
Leal / Yanguas serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.

