The Padel Brief

Group stageMenNovember 3, 2026

Leygue / Fonteny v Melisi / Benzal

T. LeygueT. Fonteny
Winner
66
A. MelisiJ. Benzal
21
Court 700:47

Pre-match odds

Leygue / Fonteny

69%

Avg Elo 1593

Melisi / Benzal

31%

Avg Elo 1522

Elo gap 71

Leygue / Fonteny delivered as 69% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Leygue / FontenyMelisi / Benzal

67%
Points won
33%
77%
Points won on serve
41%
59%
Points won on return
23%
79%
1st-serve points won
42%
60%
2nd-serve points won
33%
58%
Points won returning 1st serve
21%
67%
Points won returning 2nd serve
40%
71%
Break points converted
0%
7
Longest run of points
7
7
Service games
8
Stats by set

Set 1

65%
Points won
35%
74%
Points won on serve
42%
58%
Points won on return
26%
79%
1st-serve points won
44%
50%
2nd-serve points won
0%
56%
Points won returning 1st serve
21%
100%
Points won returning 2nd serve
50%
50%
Break points converted
0%
6
Longest run of points
3
4
Service games
4

Set 2

69%
Points won
31%
81%
Points won on serve
40%
60%
Points won on return
19%
80%
1st-serve points won
39%
100%
2nd-serve points won
50%
61%
Points won returning 1st serve
20%
50%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
100%
Break points converted
0%
7
Longest run of points
7
3
Service games
4

Point by point

Scores read Leygue / Fonteny first, Melisi / Benzal second.

61 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 16–2

Breaks 2–0

  1. 1–0

    Melisi / Benzal serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0BP
    Break
  2. 2–0

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–30
    3. 40–40
    4. A–40
    Hold
  3. 3–0

    Melisi / Benzal serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0BP
    4. 40–15BP
    Break
  4. 4–0

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15
    Hold
  5. 4–1

    Melisi / Benzal serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 30–40
    Hold
  6. 5–1

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    Hold
  7. 5–2

    Melisi / Benzal serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    4. 30–40
    5. 40–40
    6. 40–A
    7. 40–40
    Hold
  8. 6–2

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 40–30
    5. 15–30
    6. 30–30
    7. 40–30
    Hold

Set 26–1

Breaks 3–0

  1. 1–0

    Melisi / Benzal serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    Break
  2. 2–0

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    Melisi / Benzal serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    Hold
  4. 3–1

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    4. 15–40BP
    5. 30–40BP
    6. 40–40
    7. A–40
    Hold
  5. 4–1

    Melisi / Benzal serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–15BP
    Break
  6. 5–1

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  7. 6–1

    Melisi / Benzal serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–30BP
    Break

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.