Group stageWomenNovember 3, 2026
Borjeson / Andersson v El Halaby / Faidallah
Pre-match odds
50%
Avg Elo 1550
50%
Avg Elo 1550
Elo gap 0
Borjeson / Andersson won a near coin flip (50%).
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Borjeson / AnderssonEl Halaby / Faidallah
- Points won 44%
- Points won on serve 58%
- Points won on return 31%
- 1st-serve points won 51%
- 2nd-serve points won 75%
- Points won returning 1st serve 32%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 25%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 8
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 46%
- Points won on serve 70%
- Points won on return 33%
- 1st-serve points won 67%
- 2nd-serve points won 80%
- Points won returning 1st serve 33%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 33%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 4
Set 2
- Points won 41%
- Points won on serve 52%
- Points won on return 28%
- 1st-serve points won 41%
- 2nd-serve points won 73%
- Points won returning 1st serve 30%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 0%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 3
- Service games 4
Point by point
Scores read Borjeson / Andersson first, El Halaby / Faidallah second.
87 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 16–3
Breaks 1–0
- 1–0Hold
Borjeson / Andersson serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 1–1Hold
El Halaby / Faidallah serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 2–1Hold
Borjeson / Andersson serving
- 15–0
- 2–2Hold
El Halaby / Faidallah serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 3–2Hold
Borjeson / Andersson serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 4–2Break
El Halaby / Faidallah serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 5–2Hold
Borjeson / Andersson serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- 5–3Hold
El Halaby / Faidallah serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–40
- 6–3Hold
Borjeson / Andersson serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
Set 26–2
Breaks 2–0
- 1–0Break
El Halaby / Faidallah serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0BP
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 2–0Hold
Borjeson / Andersson serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- A–40
- 2–1Hold
El Halaby / Faidallah serving
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 3–1Hold
Borjeson / Andersson serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 3–2Hold
El Halaby / Faidallah serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 4–2Hold
Borjeson / Andersson serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 5–2Break
El Halaby / Faidallah serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
- 6–2Hold
Borjeson / Andersson serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.