The Padel Brief

Group stageWomenNovember 3, 2026

Borjeson / Andersson v El Halaby / Faidallah

Court 1301:06

Pre-match odds

Borjeson / Andersson

50%

Avg Elo 1550

El Halaby / Faidallah

50%

Avg Elo 1550

Elo gap 0

Borjeson / Andersson won a near coin flip (50%).

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Borjeson / AnderssonEl Halaby / Faidallah

56%
Points won
44%
69%
Points won on serve
58%
42%
Points won on return
31%
68%
1st-serve points won
51%
75%
2nd-serve points won
75%
49%
Points won returning 1st serve
32%
25%
Points won returning 2nd serve
25%
50%
Break points converted
0%
7
Longest run of points
4
9
Service games
8
Stats by set

Set 1

54%
Points won
46%
67%
Points won on serve
70%
30%
Points won on return
33%
67%
1st-serve points won
67%
67%
2nd-serve points won
80%
33%
Points won returning 1st serve
33%
20%
Points won returning 2nd serve
33%
100%
Break points converted
0%
4
Longest run of points
4
5
Service games
4

Set 2

59%
Points won
41%
72%
Points won on serve
52%
48%
Points won on return
28%
70%
1st-serve points won
41%
100%
2nd-serve points won
73%
59%
Points won returning 1st serve
30%
27%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
40%
Break points converted
0%
4
Longest run of points
3
4
Service games
4

Point by point

Scores read Borjeson / Andersson first, El Halaby / Faidallah second.

87 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 16–3

Breaks 1–0

  1. 1–0

    Borjeson / Andersson serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    6. 40–40
    7. A–40
    8. 40–40
    Hold
  2. 1–1

    El Halaby / Faidallah serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    Borjeson / Andersson serving

    1. 15–0
    Hold
  4. 2–2

    El Halaby / Faidallah serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    Hold
  5. 3–2

    Borjeson / Andersson serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    4. 40–15
    5. 40–30
    Hold
  6. 4–2

    El Halaby / Faidallah serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 40–30BP
    Break
  7. 5–2

    Borjeson / Andersson serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    4. 15–40BP
    5. 30–40BP
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–ABP
    8. 40–40
    9. 40–ABP
    10. 40–40
    Hold
  8. 5–3

    El Halaby / Faidallah serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  9. 6–3

    Borjeson / Andersson serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold

Set 26–2

Breaks 2–0

  1. 1–0

    El Halaby / Faidallah serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0BP
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    Break
  2. 2–0

    Borjeson / Andersson serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–15
    5. 15–30
    6. 30–30
    7. 40–30
    8. 40–40
    9. A–40
    10. 40–40
    11. A–40
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    El Halaby / Faidallah serving

    1. 15–30
    2. 30–30
    3. 40–40
    4. 40–A
    Hold
  4. 3–1

    Borjeson / Andersson serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15
    Hold
  5. 3–2

    El Halaby / Faidallah serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    4. 15–40
    5. 30–40
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–A
    Hold
  6. 4–2

    Borjeson / Andersson serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    Hold
  7. 5–2

    El Halaby / Faidallah serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–A
    8. 40–40
    9. A–40BP
    10. 40–40
    Break
  8. 6–2

    Borjeson / Andersson serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–15
    Hold

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.