The Padel Brief

Group stageWomenNovember 4, 2026

Sanchez / Ortega v Giusti / Piltcher

A. SanchezM. Ortega
Winner
66
J. GiustiR. Piltcher
11
Grand Stand 100:47

Pre-match odds

Sanchez / Ortega

99%

Avg Elo 1970

Giusti / Piltcher

1%

Avg Elo 1485

Elo gap 486

Sanchez / Ortega delivered as 99% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Sanchez / OrtegaGiusti / Piltcher

69%
Points won
31%
82%
Points won on serve
40%
60%
Points won on return
18%
82%
1st-serve points won
37%
83%
2nd-serve points won
50%
63%
Points won returning 1st serve
18%
50%
Points won returning 2nd serve
17%
56%
Break points converted
0%
10
Longest run of points
4
7
Service games
7
Stats by set

Set 1

70%
Points won
30%
80%
Points won on serve
36%
64%
Points won on return
20%
77%
1st-serve points won
35%
100%
2nd-serve points won
40%
65%
Points won returning 1st serve
23%
60%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
75%
Break points converted
0%
8
Longest run of points
2
3
Service games
4

Set 2

68%
Points won
32%
84%
Points won on serve
45%
55%
Points won on return
16%
87%
1st-serve points won
40%
75%
2nd-serve points won
57%
60%
Points won returning 1st serve
13%
43%
Points won returning 2nd serve
25%
40%
Break points converted
0%
5
Longest run of points
4
4
Service games
3

Point by point

Scores read Sanchez / Ortega first, Giusti / Piltcher second.

62 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 16–1

Breaks 3–0

  1. 1–0

    Giusti / Piltcher serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–40
    3. 30–40
    4. 40–40
    Break
  2. 2–0

    Sanchez / Ortega serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    4. 40–15
    5. 40–30
    Hold
  3. 3–0

    Giusti / Piltcher serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    Break
  4. 4–0

    Sanchez / Ortega serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  5. 4–1

    Giusti / Piltcher serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    6. 30–30
    7. 40–40
    8. A–40BP
    9. 40–40
    10. 40–A
    11. 40–40
    Hold
  6. 5–1

    Sanchez / Ortega serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  7. 6–1

    Giusti / Piltcher serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    Break

Set 26–1

Breaks 2–0

  1. 1–0

    Sanchez / Ortega serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  2. 1–1

    Giusti / Piltcher serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–A
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    Sanchez / Ortega serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 15–0
    4. 30–0
    Hold
  4. 3–1

    Giusti / Piltcher serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 0–0
    3. 15–15
    4. 30–15
    5. 30–30
    6. 40–30BP
    7. 40–40
    8. A–40BP
    Break
  5. 4–1

    Sanchez / Ortega serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 30–30
    3. 40–30
    Hold
  6. 5–1

    Giusti / Piltcher serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 40–30BP
    Break
  7. 6–1

    Sanchez / Ortega serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    Hold

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.