Group stageMenNovember 4, 2026
Tapia / Libaak v Joris / Fonteny
Pre-match odds
99%
Avg Elo 2023
1%
Avg Elo 1550
Elo gap 473
Tapia / Libaak delivered as 99% favourites.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Tapia / LibaakJoris / Fonteny
- Points won 49%
- Points won on serve 70%
- Points won on return 32%
- 1st-serve points won 70%
- 2nd-serve points won 71%
- Points won returning 1st serve 32%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 33%
- Break points converted 40%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 15
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 55%
- Points won on serve 69%
- Points won on return 41%
- 1st-serve points won 69%
- 2nd-serve points won 67%
- Points won returning 1st serve 41%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 67%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 6
Set 2
- Points won 41%
- Points won on serve 74%
- Points won on return 16%
- 1st-serve points won 74%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 14%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 25%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 4
Set 3
- Points won 50%
- Points won on serve 69%
- Points won on return 35%
- 1st-serve points won 68%
- 2nd-serve points won 75%
- Points won returning 1st serve 35%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 33%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 5
Point by point
Scores read Tapia / Libaak first, Joris / Fonteny second.
127 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 15–7
Breaks 1–2
- 1–0Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 1–1Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 2–1Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- 3–1Break
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 3–2Break
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 3–3Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 4–3Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 4–4Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 5–4Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 5–5Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 5–6Break
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–0
- 0–0
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 5–7Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
Set 26–3
Breaks 1–0
- 1–0Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 1–1Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 2–1Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 2–2Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 3–2Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 4–2Break
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 5–2Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 5–3Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 6–3Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
Set 36–4
Breaks 1–0
- 0–1Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 1–1Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 1–2Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 2–2Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 2–3Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 3–3Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 4–3Break
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 5–3Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 5–4Hold
Joris / Fonteny serving
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 6–4Hold
Tapia / Libaak serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 6–4—
Tapia / Libaak serving
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.


