The Padel Brief

Group stageMenNovember 4, 2026

Chingotto / Stupaczuk v Robert / Boronad

F. ChingottoF. Stupaczuk
Winner
66
J. RobertY. Boronad
21
Court 500:46

Pre-match odds

Chingotto / Stupaczuk

99%

Avg Elo 1947

Robert / Boronad

1%

Avg Elo 1456

Elo gap 491

Chingotto / Stupaczuk delivered as 99% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Chingotto / StupaczukRobert / Boronad

64%
Points won
36%
67%
Points won on serve
39%
61%
Points won on return
33%
67%
1st-serve points won
38%
60%
2nd-serve points won
100%
62%
Points won returning 1st serve
33%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
40%
71%
Break points converted
50%
8
Longest run of points
3
8
Service games
7
Stats by set

Set 1

60%
Points won
40%
60%
Points won on serve
39%
61%
Points won on return
40%
57%
1st-serve points won
39%
100%
2nd-serve points won
0%
61%
Points won returning 1st serve
43%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
60%
Break points converted
50%
6
Longest run of points
3
4
Service games
4

Set 2

68%
Points won
32%
74%
Points won on serve
40%
60%
Points won on return
26%
80%
1st-serve points won
36%
33%
2nd-serve points won
100%
64%
Points won returning 1st serve
20%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
67%
100%
Break points converted
0%
8
Longest run of points
2
4
Service games
3

Point by point

Scores read Chingotto / Stupaczuk first, Robert / Boronad second.

61 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published. Point capture for this match was incomplete.

Set 16–2

Breaks 3–1

  1. 1–0

    Chingotto / Stupaczuk serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  2. 2–0

    Robert / Boronad serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    Break
  3. 3–0

    Chingotto / Stupaczuk serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    4. 40–15
    5. 40–30
    Hold
  4. 4–0

    Robert / Boronad serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15BP
    4. 40–30BP
    Break
  5. 5–0

    Chingotto / Stupaczuk serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 30–30
    4. 30–40BP
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40
    Hold
  6. 5–1

    Robert / Boronad serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 30–30
    4. 30–40
    Hold
  7. 5–2

    Chingotto / Stupaczuk serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 30–15
    5. 30–30
    6. 30–40BP
    Break
  8. 6–2

    Robert / Boronad serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    Break

Set 25–1

Breaks 2–0

  1. 1–0

    Chingotto / Stupaczuk serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    6. 40–40
    7. A–40
    Hold
  2. 2–0

    Robert / Boronad serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 40–30BP
    Break
  3. 3–0

    Chingotto / Stupaczuk serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15
    Hold
  4. 3–1

    Robert / Boronad serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  5. 4–1

    Chingotto / Stupaczuk serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    Hold
  6. 5–1

    Robert / Boronad serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0BP
    Break
  7. 5–1

    Chingotto / Stupaczuk serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    —

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.