The Padel Brief

Group stageWomenNovember 4, 2026

El Halaby / Hakim v Kusuma / Putria

F. El HalabyM. Hakim
21
F. KusumaN. Putria
Winner
66
Court 801:06

Pre-match odds

El Halaby / Hakim

63%

Avg Elo 1485

Kusuma / Putria

37%

Avg Elo 1437

Elo gap 48

Kusuma / Putria won as slight underdogs (37%).

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

El Halaby / HakimKusuma / Putria

37%
Points won
63%
44%
Points won on serve
70%
30%
Points won on return
56%
44%
1st-serve points won
70%
0%
2nd-serve points won
100%
30%
Points won returning 1st serve
56%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
33%
Break points converted
62%
4
Longest run of points
7
7
Service games
8
Stats by set

Set 1

40%
Points won
60%
46%
Points won on serve
68%
32%
Points won on return
54%
46%
1st-serve points won
68%
0%
2nd-serve points won
0%
32%
Points won returning 1st serve
54%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
100%
Break points converted
75%
4
Longest run of points
7
4
Service games
4

Set 2

33%
Points won
67%
40%
Points won on serve
72%
28%
Points won on return
60%
40%
1st-serve points won
71%
0%
2nd-serve points won
100%
29%
Points won returning 1st serve
60%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
0%
Break points converted
50%
3
Longest run of points
5
3
Service games
4

Point by point

Scores read El Halaby / Hakim first, Kusuma / Putria second.

75 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 12–6

Breaks 1–3

  1. 1–0

    Kusuma / Putria serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15BP
    Break
  2. 2–0

    El Halaby / Hakim serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    Kusuma / Putria serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    4. 15–40
    Hold
  4. 2–2

    El Halaby / Hakim serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–ABP
    8. 40–40
    9. A–40
    10. 40–40
    Break
  5. 2–3

    Kusuma / Putria serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    Hold
  6. 2–4

    El Halaby / Hakim serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40BP
    Break
  7. 2–5

    Kusuma / Putria serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  8. 2–6

    El Halaby / Hakim serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 15–30
    5. 30–40BP
    Break

Set 21–6

Breaks 0–2

  1. 0–1

    Kusuma / Putria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–A
    8. 40–40
    Hold
  2. 0–2

    El Halaby / Hakim serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    4. 15–40BP
    Break
  3. 0–3

    Kusuma / Putria serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    4. 15–40
    Hold
  4. 0–4

    El Halaby / Hakim serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40BP
    Break
  5. 0–5

    Kusuma / Putria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    Hold
  6. 1–5

    El Halaby / Hakim serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    6. 40–40
    7. 40–ABP
    8. 40–40
    9. 40–ABP
    10. 40–40
    11. A–40
    Hold
  7. 1–6

    Kusuma / Putria serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    Hold

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.