Group stageWomenNovember 4, 2026
Araneda / Lobo v Sermant / Vierendeels
Pre-match odds
Upset73%
Avg Elo 1550
27%
Avg Elo 1462
Elo gap 89
Sermant / Vierendeels won with a 27% chance — about 1 in 4.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Araneda / LoboSermant / Vierendeels
- Points won 56%
- Points won on serve 69%
- Points won on return 44%
- 1st-serve points won 68%
- 2nd-serve points won 71%
- Points won returning 1st serve 46%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 33%
- Break points converted 62%
- Longest run of points 10
- Service games 14
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 48%
- Points won on serve 63%
- Points won on return 34%
- 1st-serve points won 65%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 36%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 20%
- Break points converted 50%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 6
Set 2
- Points won 60%
- Points won on serve 67%
- Points won on return 52%
- 1st-serve points won 61%
- 2nd-serve points won 100%
- Points won returning 1st serve 52%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 100%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 4
Set 3
- Points won 67%
- Points won on serve 81%
- Points won on return 54%
- 1st-serve points won 84%
- 2nd-serve points won 50%
- Points won returning 1st serve 55%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 50%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 4
Point by point
Scores read Araneda / Lobo first, Sermant / Vierendeels second.
139 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 17–6
Breaks 1–1
- 0–1Break
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 0–2Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 1–2Hold
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- 1–3Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 2–3Hold
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 2–4Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 3–4Hold
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 4–4Break
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 5–4Hold
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 5–5Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 6–5Hold
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 6–6Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 7–6Tiebreak
Araneda / Lobo take it 6–4
- 0–1
- 1–1
- 1–2
- 1–3
- 2–3
- 2–4
- 3–4
- 4–4
- 5–4
Set 22–6
Breaks 0–2
- 0–1Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 0–2Break
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 0–3Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 1–3Hold
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 1–4Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
- 2–4Hold
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 40–15
- 2–5Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 2–6Break
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40BP
Set 31–5
Breaks 0–2
- 0–1Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 0–2Break
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 0–3Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 1–3Hold
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 1–4Hold
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 1–5Break
Araneda / Lobo serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 1–5—
Sermant / Vierendeels serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.