QuarterfinalMenNovember 5, 2026
Patiniotis / Graziotti v Axelsson / Släryd
Pre-match odds
Upset22%
Avg Elo 1480
78%
Avg Elo 1589
Elo gap 109
Patiniotis / Graziotti won with a 22% chance — about 1 in 5.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Patiniotis / GraziottiAxelsson / Släryd
- Points won 48%
- Points won on serve 57%
- Points won on return 40%
- 1st-serve points won 55%
- 2nd-serve points won 100%
- Points won returning 1st serve 42%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 29%
- Break points converted 33%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 13
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 57%
- Points won on serve 67%
- Points won on return 48%
- 1st-serve points won 64%
- 2nd-serve points won 100%
- Points won returning 1st serve 54%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 20%
- Break points converted 40%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 4
Set 2
- Points won 43%
- Points won on serve 55%
- Points won on return 34%
- 1st-serve points won 55%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 33%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 40%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 4
Set 3
- Points won 45%
- Points won on serve 51%
- Points won on return 36%
- 1st-serve points won 50%
- 2nd-serve points won 100%
- Points won returning 1st serve 38%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 25%
- Break points converted 33%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 5
Point by point
Scores read Patiniotis / Graziotti first, Axelsson / Släryd second.
137 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 12–6
Breaks 0–2
- 1–0Hold
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 1–1Hold
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 1–2Break
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 1–3Hold
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 1–4Break
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 30–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 1–5Hold
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 2–5Hold
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 2–6Hold
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
Set 26–2
Breaks 2–0
- 1–0Hold
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- A–40
- 1–1Hold
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 30–30
- 2–1Hold
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 2–2Hold
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 3–2Hold
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 40–15
- 4–2Break
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 5–2Hold
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 6–2Break
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
Set 36–4
Breaks 2–1
- 0–1Break
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 0–2Hold
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- 1–2Hold
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 1–3Hold
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0BP
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 2–3Hold
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 3–3Break
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 4–3Hold
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 4–4Hold
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 5–4Hold
Patiniotis / Graziotti serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 6–4Break
Axelsson / Släryd serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- A–40BP
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.
