The Padel Brief

QuarterfinalMenNovember 5, 2026

Leygue / Fonteny v Shannan / Saadon

T. LeygueT. Fonteny
Winner
66
E. ShannanM. Saadon
01
Grand Stand 100:40

Pre-match odds

Leygue / Fonteny

81%

Avg Elo 1593

Shannan / Saadon

19%

Avg Elo 1465

Elo gap 128

Leygue / Fonteny delivered as 81% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Leygue / FontenyShannan / Saadon

68%
Points won
32%
77%
Points won on serve
38%
62%
Points won on return
23%
74%
1st-serve points won
41%
100%
2nd-serve points won
0%
59%
Points won returning 1st serve
26%
100%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
50%
Break points converted
0%
7
Longest run of points
5
6
Service games
7
Stats by set

Set 1

73%
Points won
27%
71%
Points won on serve
25%
75%
Points won on return
29%
64%
1st-serve points won
27%
100%
2nd-serve points won
0%
73%
Points won returning 1st serve
36%
100%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
75%
Break points converted
0%
4
Longest run of points
1
3
Service games
3

Set 2

64%
Points won
36%
86%
Points won on serve
45%
55%
Points won on return
14%
85%
1st-serve points won
48%
100%
2nd-serve points won
0%
52%
Points won returning 1st serve
15%
100%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
38%
Break points converted
0%
7
Longest run of points
5
3
Service games
4

Point by point

Scores read Leygue / Fonteny first, Shannan / Saadon second.

55 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 16–0

Breaks 3–0

  1. 1–0

    Shannan / Saadon serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–15BP
    Break
  2. 2–0

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    Hold
  3. 3–0

    Shannan / Saadon serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    Break
  4. 4–0

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 15–15
    5. 30–15
    6. 30–30
    Hold
  5. 5–0

    Shannan / Saadon serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    Break
  6. 6–0

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15
    Hold

Set 26–1

Breaks 3–0

  1. 1–0

    Shannan / Saadon serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15BP
    Break
  2. 2–0

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  3. 3–0

    Shannan / Saadon serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    6. 40–40
    7. A–40BP
    Break
  4. 4–0

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  5. 4–1

    Shannan / Saadon serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  6. 5–1

    Leygue / Fonteny serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    Hold
  7. 6–1

    Shannan / Saadon serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40
    5. 30–40
    6. 40–40
    7. A–40BP
    8. 40–40
    Break

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.