The Padel Brief

QuarterfinalWomenNovember 5, 2026

Gonzalez / Josemaria v Behram / Sjöland

B. GonzalezP. Josemaria
Winner
66
A. BehramJ. Sjöland
01
Grand Stand 100:38

Pre-match odds

Gonzalez / Josemaria

99%

Avg Elo 2010

Behram / Sjöland

1%

Avg Elo 1495

Elo gap 515

Gonzalez / Josemaria delivered as 99% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Gonzalez / JosemariaBehram / Sjöland

76%
Points won
24%
86%
Points won on serve
30%
70%
Points won on return
14%
88%
1st-serve points won
30%
50%
2nd-serve points won
30%
70%
Points won returning 1st serve
12%
70%
Points won returning 2nd serve
50%
67%
Break points converted
0%
10
Longest run of points
4
6
Service games
7
Stats by set

Set 1

86%
Points won
14%
86%
Points won on serve
14%
86%
Points won on return
14%
92%
1st-serve points won
8%
50%
2nd-serve points won
50%
92%
Points won returning 1st serve
8%
50%
Points won returning 2nd serve
50%
100%
Break points converted
0%
9
Longest run of points
1
3
Service games
3

Set 2

70%
Points won
30%
86%
Points won on serve
38%
62%
Points won on return
14%
86%
1st-serve points won
44%
0%
2nd-serve points won
25%
56%
Points won returning 1st serve
14%
75%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
50%
Break points converted
0%
10
Longest run of points
4
3
Service games
4

Point by point

Scores read Gonzalez / Josemaria first, Behram / Sjöland second.

52 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 16–0

Breaks 3–0

  1. 1–0

    Behram / Sjöland serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0BP
    Break
  2. 2–0

    Gonzalez / Josemaria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  3. 3–0

    Behram / Sjöland serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    Break
  4. 4–0

    Gonzalez / Josemaria serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 0–15
    4. 15–15
    5. 30–15
    6. 30–30
    Hold
  5. 5–0

    Behram / Sjöland serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–0
    3. 0–15
    4. 15–15
    5. 30–15
    6. 40–15BP
    Break
  6. 6–0

    Gonzalez / Josemaria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold

Set 26–1

Breaks 3–0

  1. 1–0

    Behram / Sjöland serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    Break
  2. 2–0

    Gonzalez / Josemaria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    Behram / Sjöland serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    Hold
  4. 3–1

    Gonzalez / Josemaria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–15
    Hold
  5. 4–1

    Behram / Sjöland serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0BP
    Break
  6. 5–1

    Gonzalez / Josemaria serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  7. 6–1

    Behram / Sjöland serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–30BP
    4. 40–40
    5. A–40BP
    Break
  8. 6–1

    Behram / Sjöland serving

      —

    The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.