SemifinalWomenNovember 6, 2026
Behram / Björk v Luttikhuis / Koek
Pre-match odds
Upset69%
Avg Elo 1488
31%
Avg Elo 1419
Elo gap 69
Luttikhuis / Koek won with a 31% chance — about 1 in 3.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Behram / BjörkLuttikhuis / Koek
- Points won 59%
- Points won on serve 66%
- Points won on return 54%
- 1st-serve points won 69%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 53%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 67%
- Break points converted 38%
- Longest run of points 8
- Service games 9
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 60%
- Points won on serve 62%
- Points won on return 57%
- 1st-serve points won 68%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 56%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 100%
- Break points converted 38%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 4
Set 2
- Points won 59%
- Points won on serve 69%
- Points won on return 50%
- 1st-serve points won 69%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 50%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 40%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 5
Point by point
Scores read Behram / Björk first, Luttikhuis / Koek second.
85 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 12–6
Breaks 1–3
- 1–0Break
Luttikhuis / Koek serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 2–0Hold
Behram / Björk serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 2–1Hold
Luttikhuis / Koek serving
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 2–2Break
Behram / Björk serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 2–3Hold
Luttikhuis / Koek serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 2–4Break
Behram / Björk serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 2–5Hold
Luttikhuis / Koek serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 2–6Break
Behram / Björk serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
Set 23–6
Breaks 1–2
- 0–1Hold
Luttikhuis / Koek serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 1–1Hold
Behram / Björk serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 1–2Hold
Luttikhuis / Koek serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 1–3Break
Behram / Björk serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 1–4Hold
Luttikhuis / Koek serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 1–5Break
Behram / Björk serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 2–5Break
Luttikhuis / Koek serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 3–5Hold
Behram / Björk serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 3–6Hold
Luttikhuis / Koek serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.

