The Padel Brief

SemifinalMenNovember 6, 2026

Dehnike / Abud v Martinez / Muñoz

F. DehnikeM. Abud
Winner
76
C. MartinezS. Muñoz
54
Court 801:16

Pre-match odds

Dehnike / Abud

74%

Avg Elo 1567

Martinez / Muñoz

26%

Avg Elo 1474

Elo gap 93

Dehnike / Abud delivered as 74% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Dehnike / AbudMartinez / Muñoz

57%
Points won
43%
73%
Points won on serve
57%
43%
Points won on return
27%
75%
1st-serve points won
54%
57%
2nd-serve points won
86%
46%
Points won returning 1st serve
25%
14%
Points won returning 2nd serve
43%
38%
Break points converted
50%
8
Longest run of points
5
11
Service games
11
Stats by set

Set 1

56%
Points won
44%
76%
Points won on serve
62%
38%
Points won on return
24%
76%
1st-serve points won
61%
80%
2nd-serve points won
67%
39%
Points won returning 1st serve
24%
33%
Points won returning 2nd serve
20%
25%
Break points converted
0%
5
Longest run of points
5
6
Service games
6

Set 2

58%
Points won
42%
69%
Points won on serve
52%
48%
Points won on return
31%
75%
1st-serve points won
44%
0%
2nd-serve points won
100%
56%
Points won returning 1st serve
25%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
100%
50%
Break points converted
100%
8
Longest run of points
4
5
Service games
5

Point by point

Scores read Dehnike / Abud first, Martinez / Muñoz second.

96 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 17–5

Breaks 1–0

  1. 1–0

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    Hold
  2. 1–1

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    6. 30–30
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 30–30
    4. 40–30
    Hold
  4. 2–2

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    Hold
  5. 3–2

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 30–40BP
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40
    Hold
  6. 3–3

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40
    4. 30–40
    5. 15–40
    Hold
  7. 4–3

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    Hold
  8. 4–4

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    Hold
  9. 5–4

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    Hold
  10. 5–5

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15BP
    4. 40–30BP
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40BP
    7. 40–40
    8. 40–A
    Hold
  11. 6–5

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40
    Hold
  12. 7–5

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30BP
    Break

Set 25–4

Breaks 1–1

  1. 1–0

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30
    Hold
  2. 1–1

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40
    5. 30–40
    Hold
  3. 2–1

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–30
    Hold
  4. 2–2

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15BP
    4. 40–30BP
    5. 40–40
    6. 40–A
    Hold
  5. 2–3

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–0
    4. 30–15
    5. 30–30
    6. 30–40BP
    Break
  6. 2–4

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40
    Hold
  7. 3–4

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    Hold
  8. 4–4

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–15
    3. 40–15BP
    Break
  9. 5–4

    Dehnike / Abud serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 40–0
    Hold
  10. 5–4

    Martinez / Muñoz serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–30BP
    —

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.