SemifinalMenNovember 6, 2026
De Armas / Ruiz v Bechard / Ashenden
Pre-match odds
33%
Avg Elo 1448
67%
Avg Elo 1508
Elo gap 60
De Armas / Ruiz won as slight underdogs (33%).
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
De Armas / RuizBechard / Ashenden
- Points won 44%
- Points won on serve 58%
- Points won on return 29%
- 1st-serve points won 61%
- 2nd-serve points won 33%
- Points won returning 1st serve 28%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 33%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 9
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 44%
- Points won on serve 52%
- Points won on return 37%
- 1st-serve points won 54%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 35%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 4
Set 2
- Points won 45%
- Points won on serve 63%
- Points won on return 20%
- 1st-serve points won 67%
- 2nd-serve points won 40%
- Points won returning 1st serve 20%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 20%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 5
Point by point
Scores read De Armas / Ruiz first, Bechard / Ashenden second.
83 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 16–2
Breaks 2–0
- 1–0Hold
De Armas / Ruiz serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 2–0Break
Bechard / Ashenden serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 3–0Hold
De Armas / Ruiz serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–15
- 40–30
- 3–1Hold
Bechard / Ashenden serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 4–1Hold
De Armas / Ruiz serving
- 15–0
- 0–0
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–30
- 4–2Hold
Bechard / Ashenden serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 5–2Hold
De Armas / Ruiz serving
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 6–2Break
Bechard / Ashenden serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- A–40BP
Set 26–4
Breaks 1–0
- 1–0Hold
De Armas / Ruiz serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 1–1Hold
Bechard / Ashenden serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 2–1Hold
De Armas / Ruiz serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 2–2Hold
Bechard / Ashenden serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–40
- 3–2Hold
De Armas / Ruiz serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 3–3Hold
Bechard / Ashenden serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 4–3Hold
De Armas / Ruiz serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 4–4Hold
Bechard / Ashenden serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
- 5–4Hold
De Armas / Ruiz serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 6–4Break
Bechard / Ashenden serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0BP
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.