SemifinalMenNovember 6, 2026
Lindmeyer / Merten v Windahl / Vasquez
Pre-match odds
37%
Avg Elo 1503
63%
Avg Elo 1547
Elo gap 45
Windahl / Vasquez delivered as 63% favourites.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Lindmeyer / MertenWindahl / Vasquez
- Points won 59%
- Points won on serve 71%
- Points won on return 49%
- 1st-serve points won 72%
- 2nd-serve points won 60%
- Points won returning 1st serve 47%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 60%
- Break points converted 44%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 9
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 62%
- Points won on serve 76%
- Points won on return 52%
- 1st-serve points won 79%
- 2nd-serve points won 50%
- Points won returning 1st serve 50%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 67%
- Break points converted 50%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 4
Set 2
- Points won 56%
- Points won on serve 67%
- Points won on return 47%
- 1st-serve points won 67%
- 2nd-serve points won 67%
- Points won returning 1st serve 44%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 57%
- Break points converted 40%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 5
Point by point
Scores read Lindmeyer / Merten first, Windahl / Vasquez second.
82 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 12–6
Breaks 0–2
- 0–1Break
Lindmeyer / Merten serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 0–2Hold
Windahl / Vasquez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–40
- 1–2Hold
Lindmeyer / Merten serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- 1–3Hold
Windahl / Vasquez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 1–4Break
Lindmeyer / Merten serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–40BP
- 1–5Hold
Windahl / Vasquez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 2–5Hold
Lindmeyer / Merten serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 2–6Hold
Windahl / Vasquez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
Set 24–6
Breaks 1–2
- 1–0Hold
Lindmeyer / Merten serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 1–1Hold
Windahl / Vasquez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 2–1Hold
Lindmeyer / Merten serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 2–2Hold
Windahl / Vasquez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 3–2Hold
Lindmeyer / Merten serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- 3–3Hold
Windahl / Vasquez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 3–4Break
Lindmeyer / Merten serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 4–4Break
Windahl / Vasquez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 4–5Break
Lindmeyer / Merten serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 4–6Hold
Windahl / Vasquez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.

