The Padel Brief

FinalMenNovember 7, 2026

Al Janahi / Walid v Bechard / Zelba

A. Al JanahiR. Walid
30
D. BechardM. Zelba
Winner
66
Court 1300:44

Pre-match odds

Al Janahi / Walid

29%

Avg Elo 1446

Bechard / Zelba

71%

Avg Elo 1522

Elo gap 76

Bechard / Zelba delivered as 71% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Al Janahi / WalidBechard / Zelba

34%
Points won
66%
23%
Points won on serve
55%
45%
Points won on return
77%
23%
1st-serve points won
55%
0%
2nd-serve points won
0%
45%
Points won returning 1st serve
77%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
60%
Break points converted
62%
4
Longest run of points
10
8
Service games
7
Stats by set

Set 1

37%
Points won
63%
21%
Points won on serve
43%
57%
Points won on return
79%
21%
1st-serve points won
43%
0%
2nd-serve points won
0%
57%
Points won returning 1st serve
79%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
75%
Break points converted
56%
4
Longest run of points
10
5
Service games
4

Set 2

30%
Points won
70%
25%
Points won on serve
67%
33%
Points won on return
75%
25%
1st-serve points won
67%
0%
2nd-serve points won
0%
33%
Points won returning 1st serve
75%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
0%
Break points converted
75%
2
Longest run of points
8
3
Service games
3

Point by point

Scores read Al Janahi / Walid first, Bechard / Zelba second.

63 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 13–6

Breaks 3–5

  1. 0–1

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    4. 15–40BP
    Break
  2. 0–2

    Bechard / Zelba serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    Hold
  3. 0–3

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    Break
  4. 1–3

    Bechard / Zelba serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    Break
  5. 1–4

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    Break
  6. 2–4

    Bechard / Zelba serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–15
    3. 30–30
    4. 40–40
    5. 30–40
    Break
  7. 2–5

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 15–40BP
    Break
  8. 3–5

    Bechard / Zelba serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 40–15BP
    5. 40–30BP
    Break
  9. 3–6

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 30–30
    4. 30–40BP
    5. 40–40
    6. 40–ABP
    7. 40–40
    8. 40–ABP
    Break

Set 20–6

Breaks 0–3

  1. 0–1

    Bechard / Zelba serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 30–40
    Hold
  2. 0–2

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    Break
  3. 0–3

    Bechard / Zelba serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold
  4. 0–4

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 30–30
    Break
  5. 0–5

    Bechard / Zelba serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 30–0
    3. 30–15
    4. 30–30
    5. 40–40
    6. A–40BP
    7. 40–40
    8. 40–A
    Hold
  6. 0–6

    Al Janahi / Walid serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40BP
    Break

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.