Round of 16MenNovember 9, 2026
Dominguez / Sager v Lamperti / Alvarez
Pre-match odds
64%
Avg Elo 1566
36%
Avg Elo 1516
Elo gap 51
Dominguez / Sager delivered as 64% favourites.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Dominguez / SagerLamperti / Alvarez
- Points won 45%
- Points won on serve 56%
- Points won on return 32%
- 1st-serve points won 56%
- 2nd-serve points won 57%
- Points won returning 1st serve 33%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 22%
- Break points converted 18%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 14
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 50%
- Points won on serve 72%
- Points won on return 28%
- 1st-serve points won 69%
- 2nd-serve points won 100%
- Points won returning 1st serve 29%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 0%
- Break points converted 33%
- Longest run of points 4
- Service games 5
Set 2
- Points won 42%
- Points won on serve 47%
- Points won on return 36%
- 1st-serve points won 48%
- 2nd-serve points won 43%
- Points won returning 1st serve 39%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 20%
- Break points converted 17%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 5
Set 3
- Points won 42%
- Points won on serve 50%
- Points won on return 32%
- 1st-serve points won 50%
- 2nd-serve points won 50%
- Points won returning 1st serve 32%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 33%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 4
Point by point
Scores read Dominguez / Sager first, Lamperti / Alvarez second.
140 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 14–6
Breaks 0–1
- 0–1Hold
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 1–1Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 1–2Hold
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 2–2Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15
- 2–3Hold
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 3–3Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 3–4Hold
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 4–4Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 4–5Hold
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 4–6Break
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
Set 26–4
Breaks 2–1
- 1–0Break
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0BP
- 2–0Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 2–1Hold
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 2–2Break
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 2–3Hold
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
- 3–3Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 4–3Break
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 5–3Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 5–4Hold
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 30–40
- 6–4Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
Set 36–2
Breaks 2–0
- 1–0Break
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 2–0Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 3–0Break
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 4–0Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 4–1Hold
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 5–1Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 40–15
- 5–2Hold
Lamperti / Alvarez serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 6–2Hold
Dominguez / Sager serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.


