The Padel Brief

Round of 16WomenNovember 8, 2026

Alawadhi / Alhashimi v Borrero / Navarro

A. AlawadhiM. Alhashimi
00
M. BorreroT. Navarro
Winner
66
Center Court00:24

Pre-match odds

Alawadhi / Alhashimi

18%

Avg Elo 1474

Borrero / Navarro

82%

Avg Elo 1604

Elo gap 130

Borrero / Navarro delivered as 82% favourites.

How the odds work

Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.

These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.

Elo ratings: Padel API

Match stats

Alawadhi / AlhashimiBorrero / Navarro

13%
Points won
87%
20%
Points won on serve
96%
4%
Points won on return
80%
19%
1st-serve points won
100%
33%
2nd-serve points won
80%
0%
Points won returning 1st serve
81%
20%
Points won returning 2nd serve
67%
0%
Break points converted
86%
1
Longest run of points
16
6
Service games
6
Stats by set

Set 1

11%
Points won
89%
14%
Points won on serve
92%
8%
Points won on return
86%
14%
1st-serve points won
100%
0%
2nd-serve points won
67%
0%
Points won returning 1st serve
86%
33%
Points won returning 2nd serve
0%
0%
Break points converted
100%
1
Longest run of points
16
3
Service games
3

Set 2

14%
Points won
86%
25%
Points won on serve
100%
0%
Points won on return
75%
23%
1st-serve points won
100%
33%
2nd-serve points won
100%
0%
Points won returning 1st serve
77%
0%
Points won returning 2nd serve
67%
0%
Break points converted
75%
1
Longest run of points
8
3
Service games
3

Point by point

Scores read Alawadhi / Alhashimi first, Borrero / Navarro second.

32 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.

Set 10–6

Breaks 0–3

  1. 0–1

    Alawadhi / Alhashimi serving

    1. 15–30
    2. 15–40BP
    Break
  2. 0–2

    Borrero / Navarro serving

    1. 0–15
    Hold
  3. 0–3

    Alawadhi / Alhashimi serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40BP
    Break
  4. 0–4

    Borrero / Navarro serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    Hold
  5. 0–5

    Alawadhi / Alhashimi serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 15–40BP
    Break
  6. 0–6

    Borrero / Navarro serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 15–40
    Hold

Set 20–6

Breaks 0–3

  1. 0–1

    Alawadhi / Alhashimi serving

    1. 15–15
    2. 15–30
    3. 15–40BP
    Break
  2. 0–2

    Borrero / Navarro serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    Hold
  3. 0–3

    Alawadhi / Alhashimi serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    4. 15–40BP
    Break
  4. 0–4

    Borrero / Navarro serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    Hold
  5. 0–5

    Alawadhi / Alhashimi serving

    1. 15–0
    2. 15–15
    3. 15–30
    Break
  6. 0–6

    Borrero / Navarro serving

    1. 0–15
    2. 0–30
    3. 0–40
    Hold

The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.