QuarterfinalWomenNovember 9, 2026
Martinez / Lopez v Lopez / Fassio
Pre-match odds
38%
Avg Elo 1573
62%
Avg Elo 1615
Elo gap 42
Lopez / Fassio delivered as 62% favourites.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Martinez / LopezLopez / Fassio
- Points won 52%
- Points won on serve 60%
- Points won on return 46%
- 1st-serve points won 63%
- 2nd-serve points won 40%
- Points won returning 1st serve 45%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 60%
- Break points converted 36%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 12
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 51%
- Points won on serve 54%
- Points won on return 48%
- 1st-serve points won 59%
- 2nd-serve points won 0%
- Points won returning 1st serve 48%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 33%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 6
Set 2
- Points won 54%
- Points won on serve 70%
- Points won on return 43%
- 1st-serve points won 70%
- 2nd-serve points won 67%
- Points won returning 1st serve 42%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 67%
- Break points converted 40%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 6
Point by point
Scores read Martinez / Lopez first, Lopez / Fassio second.
148 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 16–7
Breaks 2–2
- 0–1Hold
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 1–1Hold
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- 2–1Break
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 3–1Hold
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 3–2Hold
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 4–2Hold
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- A–40
- 4–3Hold
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- 4–4Break
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 4–5Hold
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 5–5Hold
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 30–30
- 40–40
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 6–5Break
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 6–6Break
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 6–7Tiebreak
Lopez / Fassio take it 7–3
- 0–1
- 0–2
- 1–2
- 1–3
- 2–3
- 2–4
- 3–4
- 3–5
- 3–6
Set 25–7
Breaks 1–2
- 0–1Break
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 0–2Hold
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 1–2Hold
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 2–2Break
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 3–2Hold
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 3–3Hold
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 4–3Hold
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 4–4Hold
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 5–4Hold
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 0–15
- 0–0
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 5–5Hold
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 5–6Break
Martinez / Lopez serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 5–7Hold
Lopez / Fassio serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.


