Round of 64MenNovember 10, 2026
Rodriguez / Garcia v Gil / Valenzuela
Pre-match odds
33%
Avg Elo 1563
67%
Avg Elo 1626
Elo gap 64
Gil / Valenzuela delivered as 67% favourites.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Point by point
Scores read Rodriguez / Garcia first, Gil / Valenzuela second.
85 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published.
Set 12–6
Breaks 0–2
- 0–1Break
Rodriguez / Garcia serving
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 0–2Hold
Gil / Valenzuela serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 0–3Break
Rodriguez / Garcia serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 0–4Hold
Gil / Valenzuela serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 1–4Hold
Rodriguez / Garcia serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 1–5Hold
Gil / Valenzuela serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 2–5Hold
Rodriguez / Garcia serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 40–15
- 2–6Hold
Gil / Valenzuela serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
Set 23–6
Breaks 0–2
- 1–0Hold
Rodriguez / Garcia serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 1–1Hold
Gil / Valenzuela serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 40–40
- 2–1Hold
Rodriguez / Garcia serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 2–2Hold
Gil / Valenzuela serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 2–3Break
Rodriguez / Garcia serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40BP
- 2–4Hold
Gil / Valenzuela serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 3–4Hold
Rodriguez / Garcia serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 3–5Hold
Gil / Valenzuela serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 3–6Break
Rodriguez / Garcia serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.



