QuarterfinalMenNovember 13, 2026
Garrido / De Pascual v Stupaczuk / Sanz
Pre-match odds
Upset12%
Avg Elo 1731
88%
Avg Elo 1904
Elo gap 173
Garrido / De Pascual won with a 12% chance — about 1 in 8.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Garrido / De PascualStupaczuk / Sanz
- Points won 41%
- Points won on serve 49%
- Points won on return 31%
- 1st-serve points won 47%
- 2nd-serve points won 71%
- Points won returning 1st serve 31%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 33%
- Break points converted 33%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 9
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 33%
- Points won on serve 41%
- Points won on return 25%
- 1st-serve points won 40%
- 2nd-serve points won 50%
- Points won returning 1st serve 22%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 100%
- Break points converted 0%
- Longest run of points 2
- Service games 3
Set 2
- Points won 45%
- Points won on serve 53%
- Points won on return 35%
- 1st-serve points won 50%
- 2nd-serve points won 80%
- Points won returning 1st serve 38%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 0%
- Break points converted 50%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 6
Point by point
Scores read Garrido / De Pascual first, Stupaczuk / Sanz second.
100 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published. Point capture for this match was incomplete.
Set 16–1
Breaks 2–0
- 1–0Hold
Garrido / De Pascual serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
- 40–15
- 1–1Hold
Stupaczuk / Sanz serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- 2–1Hold
Garrido / De Pascual serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 3–1Break
Stupaczuk / Sanz serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0BP
- 40–15BP
- 4–1Hold
Garrido / De Pascual serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- A–40
- 5–1Break
Stupaczuk / Sanz serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0BP
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 6–1Hold
Garrido / De Pascual serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0
Set 27–5
Breaks 2–1
- 1–0Break
Stupaczuk / Sanz serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 40–0BP
- 40–15BP
- 2–0Hold
Garrido / De Pascual serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 2–1Hold
Stupaczuk / Sanz serving
- 15–0
- 30–15
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 3–1Hold
Garrido / De Pascual serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 3–2Hold
Stupaczuk / Sanz serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 4–2Hold
Garrido / De Pascual serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–30
- 4–3Hold
Stupaczuk / Sanz serving
- 0–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 4–4Break
Garrido / De Pascual serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40BP
- 15–40BP
- 4–5Hold
Stupaczuk / Sanz serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 5–5Hold
Garrido / De Pascual serving
- 0–15
- 0–0
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 40–30
- 40–40
- A–40
- 6–5Break
Stupaczuk / Sanz serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 7–5Hold
Garrido / De Pascual serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 40–30
- 7–5—
Garrido / De Pascual serving
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.


