Round of 32WomenNovember 11, 2026
Dal Pozzo / Rodriguez v Jensen / Icardo
Pre-match odds
16%
Avg Elo 1775
84%
Avg Elo 1919
Elo gap 144
Jensen / Icardo delivered as 84% favourites.
How the odds work
Each pair's strength is the average of its two players' Elo ratings. A 100-point gap makes the stronger pair a 76% favourite; 200 points, 91%. The model is calibrated on 7,500+ pro matches: when it says 70%, the favourite wins about 70% of the time.
These are the odds going into the match day, on the Elo each player carried in, so the result does not leak into them.
Elo ratings: Padel API
Match stats
Dal Pozzo / RodriguezJensen / Icardo
- Points won 58%
- Points won on serve 63%
- Points won on return 53%
- 1st-serve points won 60%
- 2nd-serve points won 78%
- Points won returning 1st serve 52%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 57%
- Break points converted 62%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 9
Stats by set
Set 1
- Points won 60%
- Points won on serve 70%
- Points won on return 53%
- 1st-serve points won 69%
- 2nd-serve points won 75%
- Points won returning 1st serve 54%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 50%
- Break points converted 50%
- Longest run of points 5
- Service games 4
Set 2
- Points won 57%
- Points won on serve 59%
- Points won on return 52%
- 1st-serve points won 56%
- 2nd-serve points won 80%
- Points won returning 1st serve 50%
- Points won returning 2nd serve 67%
- Break points converted 100%
- Longest run of points 6
- Service games 5
Point by point
Scores read Dal Pozzo / Rodriguez first, Jensen / Icardo second.
86 points shown — the point that wins each game is never published. Point capture for this match was incomplete.
Set 12–6
Breaks 1–3
- 0–1Hold
Jensen / Icardo serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 0–2Break
Dal Pozzo / Rodriguez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- A–40
- 40–40
- 1–2Break
Jensen / Icardo serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 30–30
- 40–30BP
- 1–3Break
Dal Pozzo / Rodriguez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40BP
- 30–40BP
- 1–4Hold
Jensen / Icardo serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 2–4Hold
Dal Pozzo / Rodriguez serving
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 2–5Hold
Jensen / Icardo serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 2–6Break
Dal Pozzo / Rodriguez serving
- 15–0
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 40–40
- 40–ABP
Set 23–6
Breaks 1–2
- 1–0Break
Jensen / Icardo serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15BP
- 40–30BP
- 40–40
- A–40BP
- 2–0Hold
Dal Pozzo / Rodriguez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 40–15
- 2–1Hold
Jensen / Icardo serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 2–2Break
Dal Pozzo / Rodriguez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40BP
- 2–3Hold
Jensen / Icardo serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 40–40
- 3–3Hold
Dal Pozzo / Rodriguez serving
- 0–15
- 15–15
- 15–30
- 30–30
- 3–4Hold
Jensen / Icardo serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 15–30
- 15–40
- 30–40
- 40–40
- 40–A
- 3–5Break
Dal Pozzo / Rodriguez serving
- 0–15
- 0–30
- 0–40BP
- 3–6Hold
Jensen / Icardo serving
- 15–0
- 30–0
- 30–15
- 30–30
- 30–40
- 3–6—
Jensen / Icardo serving
The point that wins a game is never published by the source feed, so the winner of each game is derived from the next game's score. Where the feed had a gap, no winner is claimed.



